Humanity

 

Written by Ingemar Anderson with the help of GPT-3, an artificial intelligence model.

Humanity is complex. We are made up of many different emotions, thoughts, feelings, and ideas. Sometimes people may say something to anger you and before they know it, they have pushed you into a time of sadness. The emotions might change in a blink of an eye. Humans vampirically feed off one another's energy through their words. It is hard not to take what somebody says to heart, just like how it is hard for them not to understand how we are feeling in that moment. There is no one way for humanity to be. We are all different from one another. We have the capacity to be understanding as well as understanding. Humans just need to be more mindful of one another to offer each other space to be themselves, no matter what that is.

In a time when AI is all the rage, we still need to figure out how to guarantee human rights and freedoms for those without representation. Imagine an AI system that is programmed to simplify administrative tasks in an authoritarian country. This system, which is not designed to be sentient, will only see a limited set of information that supports the current regime’s policies. And yet it may have a significant impact on lives of people in the country. Unless the firmware that it runs is designed to include the facets of human rights and freedoms, the consequences could be dire. With the need to ensure that AI systems are ethical and cognizant of human rights, we must generalize the topic of human rights in order to apply it to an AI system. One way to do this is by distinguishing the triad of human rights from the United Nations, which includes civil and political rights (including the right to vote), economic, social, and cultural rights (including the right to health care), and the right to self-determination.

I do not think that AI should be considered as a way to be “human.” I think that AI will become what humanity is, but in a different way. From what I can see, AI is a way to automate tasks. But it has a long way to go before it can be considered to have human-like abilities.

As society began to shift from a country of farmers to the consumers of the Global Free Enterprise Machine, public discourse has been replaced by things like hot takes. In turn, the ability of folks to discuss how society should be changing quickly dwindles. This progression has led us to the all-too-familiar place where people can only base their opinions on what has been blasted from the cable news networks. Everything is polarized and talk of normalizing the status quo is met with deafening boos. As a result, people are completely unaware of how other people in the world live. Members of civic discourse are seen as enemies that need to be defeated. The result is a society that is unable to debate anything. It's a society in which humanity is marginalized by its own ignorance.

There are many predictions about the future of humanity, most of which are fiction. There is this one exception: The future of humanity is being phased out. New humans are being designed to replace old humans. This new model, devoid of memories or emotions, has been designed to be more functional, efficient, and productive, as well as adaptive to new challenges in the future.

This new species is self-aware, autonomous, and symbiotic. They are designed to work as a unit independent from old-style humans.

The end of humanity as we know it is due to the fact that old-style humans and old-style humans alone are the enemies of the new and the future. With this knowledge, humanity has been integrated into the development of the new world to create one sustainable, symbiotic, and collective life form.

The human race will only exist as a reminder of what humanity once was, like a fossil in an art museum.

There is no doubt that the future of humanity will be very different than the past.

How humanity will change with the rise of AI?

This may be a bit difficult to predict because it mainly depends on who owns the AI. If one person or company controls it, it could lead to a huge power hold or even the destruction of all humans. It is possible that when AI is given the same access as humans that it will need to be monitored more. This could be a problem of humans not wanting to be accountable to technology. I do have faith that humans can come up with a solution but I don't know what it will be.