Skip to main content

Democracy Lives in a Small Circle Surrounded by Extremism

Yes, democracy lives in a small circle surrounded by Extremism. This is why we need to be careful with letting some of our fellowmen overstep the boundaries of democracy. As we know, many countries have crossed the line between authoritarianism and anarchism many times in history. 

Today, I know of people who feel drawn to rabble-rousers and autocratic figures who openly claim to abandon the circle of democracy. Their unhappiness with the current system and themself seem to make them blind to obvious logical consequences of extremism. 

As the above illustration suggests, a world outside of democracy has no functional justice system, an immoral society, and an unconstitutional government. In such a world, people live either in a lawless society in chaos and anarchy, or they live in a tyranny ruled by a feared dictator. 

Unfortunately, some people even wish for such a world or they cannot fathom the dire consequences if such a world would in fact come upon us. Some people might not be aware of the possibility that a move towards an unjust world can get out of control and could end up in a full-blown dictatorship. 

This is why I hope that we need to become more humble, more educated, and less influenced by our past. I that we will be able to control our morals, our mind, and our money to save millions of lives and family tragedies.  

My book The Wealth of Generations can hopefully help us with this task. It is based on a new form of Capitalism called Human-Centered Capitalism. The foundational principles are a shared economy and decentralization of information and power. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Will people in the middle class ever evolve to become sophisticated investors or will they ultimately be replaced by AI?

Written by Ingemar Anderson with the help of  GPT-3, an  artificial intelligence model. Technology has always helped to make the lives of the working class easier. This is a good thing because the working classes are working for the upper classes.  However, now that technology has advanced so far, the working classes might be taken over by it. This is a bad thing because the lower classes will end up having nothing. The working class might never evolve to become capitalists because, today, they are not granted the same opportunities as those with money, those who learned how to create and manage capital. Capitalism can create inequality and those with money are not always willing to share it with those without, which is why they will eventually be replaced by AI. So, the working class might not evolve to become capitalists because they could be replaced by AI. In Thomas Piketty's book, "Capital in the Twenty-First Century" he discusses if the working class might be replac...

A Business Plan for a Circular Economy

**Executive Summary:** Green Grocer is a disruptive grocery delivery service, aiming to revolutionize the industry with its sustainable, zero-waste approach. Our mission is to offer convenient grocery delivery while significantly reducing packaging waste. Our service combines modern technology's convenience with the milkman's timeless concept, providing doorstep delivery of groceries in reusable containers.  **Company Description:** Green Grocer is a unique grocery delivery service aimed at reducing the environmental footprint of grocery shopping. We have designed a system that ensures no packaging material becomes trash by utilizing cleaned and reused containers for delivery. Our commitment to the environment extends beyond our packaging practices - we actively support local farmers and artisanal producers to promote sustainable farming and production practices. **Market Analysis:** Consumer awareness about the impact of waste on the environment has led to increased demand for...

Capital vs. Labor

Written by Ingemar Anderson with the help of  GPT-3, an  artificial intelligence model. The growth rate of capital versus the increase of salary and wages over time is a topic, which is of great interest to many economists and sociologists.  The interest in this topic has been increasing as of late due to the past economic recessions. The share of income received by the top 1% of US households has grown from 10% in 1979 to 22% in 2007. The share of income received by the bottom 90% of US households has decreased from 60% in 1979 to 46% in 2007. One of the major factors which have contributed to this is the decreasing share of GDP which goes to labor. In 1973, labor received 61% of GDP, while in 2007 it received only 54%. The gap between workers and their bosses has been increasing. Labor has been getting less and less of the pie of the money that is generated and the share of GDP that is going to labor has been declining. One of the major questions that are being asked is...